Jeg har været udenfor. Det er stærkt overvurderet.

Desværre pÃ¥ engelsk, men ret sjovt at læse en anmeldelse af at være udenfor, som om “udenfor” var et MMORPG-computerspil:

…The game world is immense, perhaps unfeasibly so. The sheer amount of resources that went into development of the Outside environment is staggering to consider. Outside is a world of tremendous size, containing examples of every known real-world terrain type and inhabited by every known real-world animal. On the other hand it is somewhat lacking in the traditionally expected, more interesting, zones where the developers would be given the opportunity to show off their skills in varying the physics and graphics of the game. There are, for instance, no zones where gravity varies to any significant degree.

The respawn rate of objects and players is ridiculously slow. A dead player can expect to wait for years to respawn, and will be set back to zero assets and a tiny, nearly helpless form. Death is hardcore, and resurrection all but impossible. Outside is not a game for the QQers out there!

In terms of the social environment, almost anything goes. Outside has a vast network of guilds, many of its players are active participants in designing the game’s social environment, and almost any player will be able to find company to undertake their desired group quests…

Læs resten på The Myth of the Media Myth: Games and Non-Gamers | MetaFilter

Skriv et svar

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.